"Critical reflection on practice is a requirement of the relationship between theory and practice. Otherwise theory becomes simply ‘blah, blah, blah’ and practice, pure activism." -- Paulo Freire
Yesterday was a good day. Great conversations, stimulating questions, real dialogism at work in both my undergrad and graduate classes. After my English 304 class, Dr. Doug Eskew (colleague extraordinaire!) and I continued talking about the ways in which we might help our students succeed.
NOTETAKING: LECTURES AND READINGS
Doug agreed with many of my observations in the last blog, and then I was delighted that he shared his latest attempt to really address the issues we often see arise in our undergrad and grad classes -- specifically as it related to notetaking. His new approach, sparked by another of our fabulous colleagues, Dr. Patricia Trujillo, was to take the classic "Cornell Notetaking Method" and revise it for his own purposes. Doug had created his own template already, but as these things often occur, one thing led to another, and before you knew it, we'd spent almost an hour in my office revising and scheming in order to come up with a document we could both use -- in all of our classes, across levels. We figured that the more students began to see consistency, the better their skills would eventually become and the more likely we'd be to see real improvement in class discussion, critical reading of texts, and reading responses in the form of our students' blogs.
To that end, beginning this week, my graduate students and undergrads alike will now be asked to, first, complete this form: Argument Notes anytime they are asked to read or respond to a supplementary text or assignment (that is, a reading not assigned from our core textbooks). And, I'll continue to suggest that the Lecture Note form is a terrific and logical way to keep lecture notes organized, useful, and on task. And, in order to explain how this system works, I'll provide an Overview of the Cornell Method of Notetaking to all my students as well (the graduate students got copies of each of these documents last night). I'll keep you posted, here, as to the feedback I get from students -- as well as any improvement I see in class discussions or student blogs.
PEDAGOGY STATEMENTS
Creating a pedagogy statement is not as easy as it might seem. I remember the first time that I was asked to critically think about my own pedagogy -- the one I wrote -- not the actual one I practiced in class mind you. When I was pushed to consider, line by line, what I claimed I believed, theoretically, to what I actually did in my classes, I was stunned to see that my theories didn't really match my practice. Oh, I claimed that I believed in a "decentered classroom," social constructionism, and more. But it turned out that these beliefs were in conflict with my real pedagogy -- the one that controlled my preparation for, reaction to, and practices in the day-to-day classroom setting.
It took a full year before I was able to articulate my true pedagogy, and I'll admit that I consider my annual pedagogy revision to be a crucial part of my teaching life. I'm continually hearing new ideas, encountering new philosophies, realizing new ways of knowing, and I sincerely believe that these revelations must be reflected in my ever-evolving pedagogy (the believing and the doing).
This semester, my English 304 students are working in teams to create a pedagogy project. They'll develop, practice, and put a short teaching lesson to the test -- in a real First Year Composition classroom. They'll attempt to articulate (to novice writers) the advanced techniques they're learning in Advanced Rhetoric, and they'll adapt these theories into practices that their less-advanced peers will find relevant to the their class goals. Many of these students hope to be teachers someday, and a number of them are well on their way to becoming scholars. They're inquisitive and engaged, and I am looking forward to seeing the results of this little "experiment" were conducting together.
So, though I won't be asking the undergraduates to write a lengthy, formal pedagogy statement of their own, I think this teaching opportunity will go a long way towards helping them, eventually, develop more workable connections between practice and theory. And, as my graduate students (most of whom are teachers and all of whom are writers) work to develop their own complex statements this next few weeks, I hope that, like me, they'll be willing to share the good, the bad, and the ugly with their less experienced counterparts. Maybe some of you will too (Dr. Gregory, Andrews, Barnes, Eskew, et al).
In the meantime, I want to share a few documents that, in no particular order, have, at different times, been crucial for me as I developed, revised, and completely scraped and started anew on my own pedagogy statement. The first document [Prompts for Pedagogy Statement]offers prompts to help get you started on your philosophy (I'd credit those who originated this list, but it's really morphed into a different document over the last few years), and the second provides a nice overview on various philosophies associated with creating and then rethinking your own pedagogy: The Philosophy of the Pedagogy. I hope these help you as you begin to think about your goals for the classroom.
Finally, a few "housekeeping" notes for classes...
English 304
Just a reminder: In lieu of your 2 required homework blogs each week, you may opt to replace one of these original posts (which one is your choice) with an original comment on this blog (http://drsouder.blogspot.com); as with your other homework, this comment must be posted by no later than 11pm on Thursdays. Your three responses to your classmates blogs for each week, as normal, are due on Sundays by 11pm.
English 501
Just a reminder: You should still post your original blog entry (on the assigned readings, see last week's blog on this same site for tips and some additional direction) by no later than each Thursday at 11pm. I have told you that you may now, rather than replying to 3 of your classmates' blogs (due every Sunday by 11pm), respond to only 2 and make your third response to this blog. It's up to your -- and you may vary how you divide these responses each week. Finally, remember that next week (Feb2), you'll need to have a draft of your own pedagogy statement (rough is fine) with you in class for revision, discussion, and possible blogging.
Have a productive week! See you all soon...
--DR. DONNA
Reading :: Concept Formation in the Wild
-
Concept Formation in the Wild
By Yrjo Engestrom
Sometime last year, I became interested in what is meant by “concept” — a
term that is used broadly, i...
1 week ago